<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Desktop Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about Lucene, Nutch, Hadoop &#38; other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: niktu</title>
		<link>http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-12335</link>
		<dc:creator>niktu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-12335</guid>
		<description>Desktop Search, these i&#039;ve found:

Red-Piranha Search and Knowledge - Community Edition - Java J2EE Tomcat Lucene Xml Rdf
http://red-piranha.sourceforge.net/

SourceForge.net: Lucene desktop index
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lucenedesktop/

SourceForge.net: DocSearcher
http://sourceforge.net/projects/docsearcher/

SourceForge.net: DocFetcher
http://sourceforge.net/projects/docfetcher/

Main Page - Beagle
http://beagle-project.org/Main_Page



personally i&#039;m using http://sourceforge.net/projects/lucenedesktop/
mostlyu because i&#039;ve found it early and like its spartan interface
(umm, i assume that regexp file inclusion/exlusion masks can appeal only to programmers ... thats plus for me, not neccesairly for average joe :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desktop Search, these i&#8217;ve found:</p>
<p>Red-Piranha Search and Knowledge &#8211; Community Edition &#8211; Java J2EE Tomcat Lucene Xml Rdf<br />
<a href="http://red-piranha.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://red-piranha.sourceforge.net/</a></p>
<p>SourceForge.net: Lucene desktop index<br />
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/lucenedesktop/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/lucenedesktop/</a></p>
<p>SourceForge.net: DocSearcher<br />
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/docsearcher/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/docsearcher/</a></p>
<p>SourceForge.net: DocFetcher<br />
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/docfetcher/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/docfetcher/</a></p>
<p>Main Page &#8211; Beagle<br />
<a href="http://beagle-project.org/Main_Page" rel="nofollow">http://beagle-project.org/Main_Page</a></p>
<p>personally i&#8217;m using <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/lucenedesktop/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/lucenedesktop/</a><br />
mostlyu because i&#8217;ve found it early and like its spartan interface<br />
(umm, i assume that regexp file inclusion/exlusion masks can appeal only to programmers &#8230; thats plus for me, not neccesairly for average joe :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwiz</title>
		<link>http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-11187</link>
		<dc:creator>jwiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-11187</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found those two on SourceForge.net:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/docfetcher/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/docsearcher/

The first one is quite easy to use, but only runs on Windows at the moment (though the project site states it is platform-independent) and it doesn&#039;t support Microsoft Word documents (not yet?), while the second one does, but its GUI really needs some cleanup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found those two on SourceForge.net:<br />
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/docfetcher/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/docfetcher/</a><br />
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/docsearcher/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/docsearcher/</a></p>
<p>The first one is quite easy to use, but only runs on Windows at the moment (though the project site states it is platform-independent) and it doesn&#8217;t support Microsoft Word documents (not yet?), while the second one does, but its GUI really needs some cleanup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Hello,
Can I know any information regarding security features proovided by Lucene desktop search.
Apart from that can I implement any other security feature in it like EFS to make it more powerful.
Waiting for early response.
Yours Truly,
Vivek Singh.--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
Can I know any information regarding security features proovided by Lucene desktop search.<br />
Apart from that can I implement any other security feature in it like EFS to make it more powerful.<br />
Waiting for early response.<br />
Yours Truly,<br />
Vivek Singh.&#8211;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that I&#039;m not up to date on the desktop search scene. For example I don&#039;t know why do we call it &quot;desktop search&quot; when it can be run on laptops and doesn&#039;t connect to a computer&#039;s wallpaper. And I don&#039;t know what all the OSS options are. But anyway...

I recently downloaded Windows Desktop Search that comes as an add-in for the MSN toolbar, and my complaints are two-fold. 1) it doesn&#039;t let me limit my search to particular directories. 2) It doesn&#039;t read enough meta-data in XML/HTML file formats. It is however a vast improvement over the Altavista desktop search I downloaded about six years ago- that thing wouldn&#039;t find the documents I was looking for and at the same time gave my oodles of false positives.

I don&#039;t know what Google&#039;s search is like because I haven&#039;t tried it. But I hope the open source technologies can provide good competition for the proprietary offerings. 

BTW, just my two cents: a small download size would be advantageous but shouldn&#039;t be a requirment in desktop search. Like the other guy said, download time really doesn&#039;t matter much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that I&#8217;m not up to date on the desktop search scene. For example I don&#8217;t know why do we call it &#8220;desktop search&#8221; when it can be run on laptops and doesn&#8217;t connect to a computer&#8217;s wallpaper. And I don&#8217;t know what all the OSS options are. But anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>I recently downloaded Windows Desktop Search that comes as an add-in for the MSN toolbar, and my complaints are two-fold. 1) it doesn&#8217;t let me limit my search to particular directories. 2) It doesn&#8217;t read enough meta-data in XML/HTML file formats. It is however a vast improvement over the Altavista desktop search I downloaded about six years ago- that thing wouldn&#8217;t find the documents I was looking for and at the same time gave my oodles of false positives.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what Google&#8217;s search is like because I haven&#8217;t tried it. But I hope the open source technologies can provide good competition for the proprietary offerings. </p>
<p>BTW, just my two cents: a small download size would be advantageous but shouldn&#8217;t be a requirment in desktop search. Like the other guy said, download time really doesn&#8217;t matter much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techknight</title>
		<link>http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Techknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cutting.wordpress.com/2005/02/14/open-source-desktop-search/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>We do have few open source desktop search applications which I find are on their way to become stable and provide robust search features. Though nascent we should be soon seeing some action here. I have found two of them and mentioned my experience with them &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://open-source.onestop.net/2006/02/open-source-desktop-search.html&quot; TITLE=&quot;Open Source Applications for Windows&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do have few open source desktop search applications which I find are on their way to become stable and provide robust search features. Though nascent we should be soon seeing some action here. I have found two of them and mentioned my experience with them <a HREF="http://open-source.onestop.net/2006/02/open-source-desktop-search.html" TITLE="Open Source Applications for Windows" rel="nofollow">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
